Alexander the Great, the legendary Macedonian king, embarked on a relentless campaign of expansion that eventually brought him to the doorstep of the Indian subcontinent in 327 BCE. His path into this new land was through the treacherous Khyber and Pir-Sar mountain passes, where he encountered fierce resistance from local tribes. Despite facing armies three to five times larger than his own, Alexander’s forces pushed forward, their reputation as formidable warriors preceding them. As they advanced into the Punjab region, messengers were dispatched to local rulers, demanding their allegiance. Many chose to submit, but King Porus, a powerful Indian monarch, refused to bow down. Instead, he rallied his forces, preparing for a confrontation with Alexander at the Battle of the Hydaspes River.
Alexander’s Indian Allies
The Macedonian army’s journey through the Khyber and Pir-Sar passes was fraught with peril, as local tribes fiercely defended their territory. However, Alexander’s forces, though outnumbered, prevailed, fueled by their unwavering determination and the aura of invincibility surrounding their leader. Stories of Alexander’s triumphs had spread throughout the region, including areas that had once been under the control of the mighty Achaemenid Empire.
To consolidate his authority, Alexander sent envoys ahead of his army, demanding that local rulers pledge their loyalty or face the consequences. At this juncture, a significant alliance was forged with Ambhi, the ruler of Taxila (Takshasila), a prominent Indian kingdom. Ambhi, known to the Macedonians as Taxiles or Omphis, had previously sent an ambassador to Alexander in Sogdiana, signaling his willingness to cooperate.
With Alexander’s army now within his borders, Taxiles formally declared his allegiance, offering lavish gifts as a token of his loyalty. Alexander, in turn, reciprocated with gifts of his own, confirming Taxiles as the ruler of his kingdom and even expanding his domain with newly conquered territories. Taxila became a haven for Alexander’s army, a place to rest and recuperate, and a strategic base for planning the next phase of his campaign.
However, not all Indian rulers welcomed Alexander’s arrival. Taxiles’ eagerness to cooperate stemmed partly from his own conflict with a formidable adversary, King Porus.
The Rise of King Porus
Porus (or Poros) ruled a powerful kingdom nestled between the Jhelum (Hydaspes) and Chenab (Acesines) rivers, a realm said to encompass over 300 cities. Curiously, Porus’s name is absent from Indian historical records; our knowledge of him comes primarily from Greek and Macedonian sources. Some scholars speculate that he might have been a king of the Puru, an ancient Rigvedic confederation.
Others have drawn attention to Greek accounts mentioning Porus’s troops carrying banners depicting Herakles with a snake, suggesting a connection to the kingdom of Surasena. This kingdom, named after a mythical king who married a Naga snake woman, was located some distance away, making this association less certain.
What remains clear is that Porus was a formidable ruler, locked in a bitter rivalry with Taxiles. Years earlier, Porus had been implicated in the assassination of Taxiles’ uncle, the previous king.
When Alexander’s demand for surrender reached Porus, he staunchly refused, choosing defiance over submission. This was a challenge Alexander couldn’t ignore. Any sign of weakness could embolden other rulers to resist, and those who had already surrendered might reconsider their allegiance. Leaving such a powerful opponent unchecked would also jeopardize Alexander’s continued advance. Both sides braced themselves for the inevitable clash.
Clash of Civilizations: The Opposing Armies
The armies that converged at the Battle of the Hydaspes were a diverse tapestry of warriors from across the ancient world. Alexander’s core force comprised his seasoned Macedonian troops, augmented by soldiers recruited during his conquests.
Among the most formidable additions were the Saka horse archers, recruited in Sogdiana and Bactria, renowned for their agility and deadly accuracy. Taxiles, the allied Indian ruler, also contributed a substantial contingent of troops. In total, Alexander’s army is estimated to have numbered around 40,000 infantry and 5,000-7,000 cavalry. However, the exact number of troops participating in the battle remains uncertain.
Estimates of Porus’s army size are even more elusive, hampered by the scarcity of information about Indian armies during this period. It’s generally believed that Porus commanded a larger force than Alexander, though perhaps not by a significant margin. Most estimates place his army at around 50,000 to 54,000 strong. The bulk of Porus’s army consisted of infantry, considered less skilled than their Macedonian counterparts. However, they wielded powerful bows with deadly proficiency.
Porus’s cavalry contingent numbered between 2,000 and 4,000 horsemen, complemented by around 1,000 chariots. While chariots had become less common in other parts of the ancient world, they remained an integral part of Indian warfare. The centerpiece of Porus’s army was his formidable force of 200 war elephants, massive beasts that instilled fear in their opponents. Porus himself led his troops from atop a particularly large war elephant, a symbol of his authority and might.
More Affairs
Pre-Battle Maneuvers
The two armies faced each other across the Hydaspes River, a formidable natural barrier. The river’s depth and swift current meant that any attempt to cross under enemy fire would likely end in disaster. For days, Alexander marched his army along the riverbank, searching for a suitable crossing point, with Porus’s forces mirroring their movements on the opposite side.
Eventually, Alexander identified a promising location: a wooded island in the middle of the river that obscured the view from the other side. To deceive Porus, Alexander left the majority of his army in camp under the command of a general, who staged a feigned crossing to divert attention.
By the time Porus realized Alexander’s true intentions, a substantial force of 15,000-20,000 Macedonians had already crossed the river. Porus reacted swiftly, dispatching a contingent of cavalry and chariots led by his son to either block the crossing or buy time for the rest of his army to redeploy. This rapid response caught Alexander somewhat off guard. He launched a hasty cavalry charge, aided by the muddy riverbanks that hindered the maneuverability of the Indian chariots.
In the ensuing clash, Porus’s son was slain, and his forces were scattered. Recognizing the seriousness of the situation, Porus abandoned his initial plan and led the main body of his army to confront Alexander, leaving a small detachment to monitor the Macedonian camp and prevent further crossings.
Cavalry Clashes and the Elephant Onslaught
With the river crossed, the armies of Alexander and Porus prepared for battle. The Indian army deployed its cavalry on both flanks, with chariots in front, while the infantry formed the center, shielded by the war elephants. Alexander concentrated his cavalry on his right wing, facing the Indian left, while the Macedonian infantry formed the rest of his line.
The Indian infantry significantly outnumbered their Macedonian counterparts, their numerical advantage further bolstered by the presence of the fearsome war elephants. Recognizing this, Alexander decided to focus his initial attack on Porus’s cavalry. The battle commenced with Alexander sending his horse archers to harass the Indian cavalry on their right, while he personally led a charge against the Indian cavalry on their left flank.
Seeing their comrades in danger, the Indian cavalry on the right rushed to their aid. However, they were pursued by the rest of the Macedonian cavalry, who effectively outflanked both Indian wings. Encircled by the Macedonians, the Indian cavalry attempted a desperate maneuver, forming a defensive circle. However, this complex tactic only added to the chaos.
Unable to withstand the Macedonian onslaught, the Indian cavalry broke ranks and fled towards the relative safety of their war elephants. Horses, notoriously apprehensive around elephants, require specialized training to overcome their fear. Porus then led his war elephants in a counterattack against Alexander’s cavalry, only to be met by the advancing Macedonian infantry.
The Bloodiest Battle of Alexander’s Career
Porus’s war elephants, heavily armored and carrying archers and javelin throwers, were a formidable force. While they outnumbered the Macedonian infantry, the Indian infantry lacked comparable armor and were at a disadvantage against the long Macedonian sarissas (pikes). When the war elephants crashed into the Macedonian phalanx, they inflicted heavy casualties.
Macedonian soldiers were impaled on the elephants’ tusks, trampled underfoot, or even snatched up by their trunks and hurled through the air. The Macedonian infantry fought back valiantly, targeting the elephants and their riders whenever possible. Meanwhile, Porus’s cavalry rallied and launched another charge against the Macedonian cavalry.
Alexander met this renewed assault head-on and drove back the Indian horsemen, forcing them to flee the battlefield. At the same time, the Macedonian infantry finally began to gain ground against the elephants, pushing them back into their own ranks. The panicked elephants, in their retreat, trampled many of their own infantry to death.
While the tide of battle had turned in favor of the Macedonians, they were still outnumbered by Porus’s infantry and the surviving war elephants. Undeterred, the Macedonians locked their shields and advanced on the Indian infantry. With the Indians now engaged at the front, Alexander led a decisive cavalry charge into their rear, shattering their formations. The Indian infantry, caught in a pincer movement, disintegrated and began to flee. At this critical moment, the Macedonian troops who had been left guarding the camp crossed the river and joined the battle, further bolstering Alexander’s forces.
A King’s Respect for a King
Throughout the battle, Porus had displayed extraordinary courage and leadership. Even as his army crumbled around him, he continued to fight from atop his elephant, determined to die fighting rather than be captured. Alexander, witnessing Porus’s unwavering resolve, developed a deep admiration for his adversary. Porus’s refusal to flee or surrender stood in stark contrast to the behavior of other kings Alexander had encountered.
Recognizing Porus’s valor, Alexander sent Taxiles, the allied Indian ruler, to negotiate Porus’s surrender. However, the sight of his hated enemy enraged Porus, who hurled a spear at Taxiles, forcing him to retreat. Subsequent messengers met with similar hostility. Finally, a close friend of Porus persuaded him to heed Alexander’s offer.
Dismounting from his elephant, overcome by thirst, Porus demanded a drink before allowing himself to be brought before Alexander. Porus, tall and powerfully built, made a striking impression. When Alexander inquired how he wished to be treated, Porus responded with dignity, “Treat me as a king would treat another king.”
Porus’s boldness and spirit resonated with Alexander. Not only did he honor Porus’s request, but he also allowed him to retain his throne and all his lands, even granting him additional territories. Alexander also facilitated a reconciliation between Porus and Taxiles, fostering a semblance of unity among his newly conquered subjects.
The Battle’s Aftermath and Lasting Legacy
The Battle of the Hydaspes was the most brutal and costly battle of Alexander’s illustrious military career. Macedonian casualties are estimated to have ranged from 200 to 1,000, surpassing even the losses suffered at the pivotal Battle of Gaugamela. Indian casualties are harder to determine but are believed to have been around 20,000. Following the battle, Alexander acquired a substantial number of war elephants, adding these formidable creatures to his army.
The battle also marked a personal loss for Alexander. Bucephalus, his beloved horse, tamed by Alexander as a boy in Macedonia, perished in the fighting. The loss of his loyal companion deeply saddened the king.
In the aftermath of the battle, Alexander established two new cities. Nikaia was founded near or on the battlefield itself, while on the opposite bank of the river, he founded Boukephala, named in honor of his fallen steed.
The Battle of the Hydaspes had far-reaching consequences. It disrupted the political landscape of the region, paving the way for significant changes in the Indian subcontinent. For the Macedonians, the battle’s brutality made the prospect of further conflict with more powerful Indian kingdoms less appealing.
However, the encounter also fostered a cultural exchange between Greece and India, leading to the creation of some of antiquity’s most remarkable works of art. The Battle of the Hydaspes, though a bloody and hard-fought victory, proved to be a turning point in Alexander’s campaign, leaving an enduring mark on both his legacy and the history of India.
