The Armenian Genocide and Turkish Jews

Explores the complex relationship between Turkish Jews and the Armenian genocide, revealing a history of silence and a growing desire for open dialogue.

going_along_to_get_along_1050x700

The history of Turkey’s Jewish community is deeply intertwined with the nation’s complex past, including the tragic events of 1915, when the Ottoman government orchestrated the mass killing and displacement of its Armenian population. This event, widely recognized as the Armenian genocide, has left an indelible mark on Turkey’s historical narrative and continues to fuel debate and controversy both within the country and internationally. For Turkish Jews, navigating this sensitive issue has required a delicate balance, shaped by their own history of persecution, their desire for peaceful coexistence within Turkish society, and their growing awareness of human rights and social justice.

This article delves into the experiences and perspectives of Turkish Jews regarding the Armenian genocide, drawing upon recent research and scholarly analysis. It examines the historical context that shaped their relationship with Armenians, the dominant cultural attitudes within the Jewish community, and the evolving perspectives on acknowledging and commemorating this historical tragedy. Through this exploration, we can gain a deeper understanding of the challenges faced by minority communities in confronting difficult historical truths and the potential for fostering empathy and solidarity in the face of past injustices.

A Shared History of Minority Status

Both Armenians and Jews have held a long-standing presence in the region that encompasses modern-day Turkey. During the Ottoman Empire, both communities were classified as “protected minorities,” or dhimmis. This status granted them limited autonomy in their religious and cultural practices but also subjected them to various restrictions and discriminatory measures. While Armenians and Jews largely lived in separate communities, maintaining their distinct traditions, their shared status as non-Muslim minorities created a common ground for understanding. However, this shared experience didn’t necessarily translate into strong alliances or close-knit bonds. The interactions between the two groups were often limited to practical necessities, and they largely thrived independently within the broader Ottoman society.

The Rise of Nationalism and the Armenian Genocide

The late 19th and early 20th centuries witnessed the rise of nationalist movements across the Ottoman Empire, leading to increased tensions and conflicts between different ethnic and religious groups. For Armenians, this period marked a growing desire for self-determination and, in some cases, independence. These aspirations clashed with the Ottoman government’s efforts to maintain centralized control and preserve the empire’s territorial integrity.

In 1915, amidst the chaos of World War I, the Ottoman government initiated a systematic campaign against its Armenian population. This campaign involved the arrest and execution of Armenian intellectuals and community leaders, followed by the forced deportation of hundreds of thousands of Armenians from their ancestral lands. These deportations were characterized by brutal conditions, leading to widespread death and suffering. Historians estimate that between 600,000 and 1.5 million Armenians perished during this period.

While many countries and scholars recognize these events as genocide, the Turkish government continues to deny this classification, maintaining that the deaths were a result of wartime chaos and intercommunal violence. This denial has created a deep rift between Turkey and many other nations, particularly those with significant Armenian diasporas.

The Turkish Jewish Response: The Kayades Mindset

In the aftermath of the Armenian genocide and the establishment of the Republic of Turkey in 1923, Turkish Jews adopted a cautious approach to this sensitive issue. The dominant cultural attitude within the community, known as the Kayades mindset, emphasized discretion and a desire to avoid any actions that could jeopardize their standing within Turkish society. The term Kayades, derived from the Ladino word for “keeping quiet,” reflects a pragmatic strategy of maintaining a low profile and refraining from publicly challenging the official narrative regarding the Armenian genocide.

This approach was rooted in the community’s historical experiences and a desire to ensure their safety and well-being in a predominantly Muslim nation. Turkish Jews had faced periods of discrimination and persecution throughout their history, including the Varlık Vergisi, a discriminatory wealth tax imposed on non-Muslims in 1942. These experiences fostered a sense of vulnerability and a belief that maintaining good relations with the Turkish state was essential for their survival.

As a result, Turkish Jews largely remained silent on the issue of the Armenian genocide, choosing not to publicly acknowledge or commemorate the events. Some members of the community actively supported the Turkish government’s denial of the genocide, even lobbying against international efforts to recognize it. This stance, while controversial, was seen by many as a necessary measure to protect the community’s interests and avoid antagonizing the Turkish state.

The Emergence of the Avlaremoz Mindset

In recent decades, a new generation of Turkish Jews has begun to challenge the traditional Kayades mindset. This emerging perspective, known as the Avlaremoz mindset, emphasizes the importance of open dialogue, social justice, and solidarity with other marginalized groups. The term Avlaremoz, meaning “we will speak” in Ladino, reflects a growing desire to break the silence surrounding the Armenian genocide and to engage with this difficult chapter in Turkish history.

This shift in perspective is driven by various factors, including the increasing awareness of human rights issues globally, the rise of social media and the internet, which facilitate open communication and information sharing, and the growing influence of younger generations who are less bound by the historical anxieties that shaped the Kayades mindset.

Those who embrace the Avlaremoz approach believe that acknowledging the Armenian genocide is a moral imperative and a necessary step towards fostering reconciliation and healing within Turkish society. They argue that silence only perpetuates the pain and injustice experienced by Armenians and hinders efforts to build a more inclusive and democratic future for Turkey.

The Holocaust and Competitive Victimhood

The Holocaust, a defining event in Jewish history, has played a complex role in shaping Turkish Jewish perspectives on the Armenian genocide. The memory of the Holocaust understandably evokes deep emotions and a heightened sensitivity to any discussions of genocide. However, this sensitivity can sometimes manifest as competitive victimhood, where acknowledging the suffering of one group is perceived as diminishing the significance of another’s suffering.

This dynamic can create a barrier to empathy and solidarity between different groups who have experienced historical trauma. Some Turkish Jews may feel that recognizing the Armenian genocide would somehow overshadow or minimize the unique horror of the Holocaust. This fear can lead to a reluctance to engage with the Armenian experience and a tendency to prioritize the Jewish narrative of suffering.

However, other Turkish Jews argue that recognizing the Armenian genocide does not diminish the significance of the Holocaust. They believe that acknowledging the suffering of all victims of genocide is essential for upholding human rights and preventing future atrocities. They see the Holocaust as a reminder of the dangers of hatred and intolerance and a call to action to combat all forms of discrimination and persecution.

Navigating the Future: Towards Reconciliation and Dialogue

The Turkish Jewish community is currently grappling with these competing perspectives on the Armenian genocide. The debate reflects broader societal shifts within Turkey, where the official denial of the genocide is increasingly being challenged by academics, activists, and members of civil society.

The future of this debate will likely be shaped by various factors, including the evolving political climate in Turkey, the growing influence of younger generations, and the ongoing efforts to promote human rights and historical justice globally. It remains to be seen whether the Avlaremoz mindset will gain wider acceptance within the Turkish Jewish community and whether this will lead to a more open and honest engagement with the Armenian genocide.

The experiences of Turkish Jews provide valuable insights into the challenges faced by minority communities in navigating complex historical narratives and the potential for fostering empathy and solidarity in the face of past injustices. Their story highlights the importance of open dialogue, critical thinking, and a commitment to human rights in building a more just and inclusive future for all.

By understanding the diverse perspectives within the Turkish Jewish community and the historical context that shaped them, we can gain a deeper appreciation for the complexities of memory, identity, and reconciliation. The ongoing debate surrounding the Armenian genocide in Turkey serves as a reminder of the enduring legacy of historical trauma and the importance of confronting difficult truths in order to heal the wounds of the past.


Support us!

We take it as our mission to deliver knowledge of history across the world to everyone. Your support will help this project live on!

$5.00

TAKE OUR STORIES AWAY