In the spring of 1961, one of Yellowstone’s most famous “tourist attractions” wasn’t a geyser, a waterfall, or a canyon. It was a bear.
Her name was Sylvia.
Wherever she wandered—along the Firehole River, across the meadow in front of Old Faithful Lodge, or seemingly posing near the great geyser itself—camera shutters snapped nonstop. The dream souvenir for visitors that year wasn’t just a postcard of Old Faithful. It was a close-up of Sylvia, a 225-pound grizzly, and her three tiny cubs, each barely bigger than a lapdog.
She was a star. And that was exactly the problem.
The “Tamest” Grizzly the Scientists Ever Met
Sylvia first appeared in the notes of wildlife biologist John Craighead in the summer of 1959. John and his brother Frank, both conservationists, had been hired by Yellowstone National Park to carry out a long-term study of grizzly bears.
Among the many bears they tagged and tracked, Sylvia stood out. In John’s words, she was “the tamest grizzly we ever encountered.” While other bears roared, lunged, or tried to break out of traps—like the infamous Ivan the Terrible, a giant grizzly who threw himself around the cage in a “towering rage” and later chased the scientists’ car—Sylvia did the opposite.
She calmly allowed the brothers to come within twenty-five feet of her.
To most people, that sounds reassuring. To John, it was terrifying. A bear that relaxed around humans was a bear on a collision course with trouble, especially in a park that hosted 1.5 million visitors that year.
“She will probably cause trouble,” he wrote in June 1961. One bad swipe at a tourist, he knew, and the bear would almost certainly pay with her life—and their entire research project could be shut down.
support our project
At History Affairs, we believe history belongs to everyone.
Your contribution helps us keep this global archive open, free, and growing — so people everywhere can learn from the past and shape a better future.
Can Bears and People Really Share a Park?
The Craigheads’ work centered on two big questions:
- Can grizzly bears and people coexist in crowded national parks?
- If yes, how do we make that coexistence actually work?
By the early 1960s, close encounters were becoming much more common. Cars stopped along roadsides whenever a bear appeared. People leaned out with cameras. Some even inched closer for a better shot. Bears, especially those like Sylvia, grew more accustomed to human presence.
And then there was the food.
For years, Yellowstone had run open garbage dumps inside the park. Visitors’ trash—about 1,000 cans per day at one major site in 1961—was tossed into pits and lightly covered with soil. The bears quickly learned where the buffet was.
One of the main feeding spots was Trout Creek. It wasn’t known for fish; it was known for rubbish. To grizzlies, it was like an endless, noisy banquet table. Dozens of bears gathered there to feed, fight, play, and mate. In earlier decades, some of these dumps had even been outfitted with viewing stands for tourists, turning the nightly garbage feast into a kind of rough-and-tumble wildlife show.
The Craigheads watched this scene day after day. They didn’t just see “bears at a dump.” They saw individuals: dominant males, nervous mothers, bold cubs, simmering rivalries and fragile alliances. It was messy, but it was also a functioning ecology of a sort.
The Trash Problem Yellowstone Created
By the 1960s, park managers had begun to rethink the dumps. They worried that easy access to human garbage was drawing bears into developed areas and making them too comfortable around people.
As John Craighead put it, it was “the old story—you can’t disturb or disrupt nature without starting a cause and effect relationship.”
Years earlier, the park had already tested what happened when you suddenly took that food away. In 1941, some dumps were closed with little warning. The next year, hungry bears went searching for replacement meals in campgrounds and hotels. Rangers ended up killing 28 grizzlies and 54 black bears.
The lesson was seared into the Craigheads’ minds. They came to see the dumps as the “ecological equivalents of the spawning salmon runs that attract and concentrate Alaskan brown bear”—not natural, but now deeply built into the bears’ seasonal routines.
Their long-term conclusion was controversial: feeding at the dumps, they argued, didn’t usually turn grizzlies into hopeless “garbage bears” or make them permanently dependent on people. But shutting the dumps too quickly, without a transition plan, absolutely could create problem bears.
So when Yellowstone eventually decided in the late 1960s and early 1970s to close the remaining dumps and overhaul garbage storage in campgrounds, the Craigheads strongly disagreed. They believed the policy would “create” many more troublesome campground grizzlies, not fewer.
“For a grizzly to lose its shyness or fear of man,” they wrote, “requires cooperation and encouragement. And the initiative is usually with man.”
More reading
Sylvia’s Rise—and the Turning Point
Sylvia’s story is a perfect example of what they meant.
At first, the park itself encouraged her fame. Rangers didn’t mind the photographers. Visitors loved the “friendly” bear mother and her cubs. But as the summer crowds grew and Sylvia kept hanging around roads, lodges, and campgrounds, the tone shifted.
The bears began raiding campsites for leftover food. Rangers were now working late into the night to push “the curious and ignorant,” as Craighead bluntly described some visitors, away from close encounters.
“The rangers were frantic and wanted Sylvia removed,” he noted.
On June 8, 1961, before dawn, the scientists tranquilized Sylvia and her cubs. The plan was to examine them and move them to a safer area, away from the densest tourist traffic.
Things did not go smoothly.
One cub woke early from sedation and bolted. When the team couldn’t cut him off with a vehicle, John Craighead sprinted after him and, in a moment straight out of a sports reel, managed a flying tackle just before the cub reached the creek bank. That fiery little bear earned his new name: Ignatz.
Sylvia and Ignatz were later released at Trout Creek, back into the complex world of the trash dumps and the other bears. The scientists kept Sylvia’s other two cubs in captivity.
But fame and habit are hard to relocate. Soon, Sylvia was again spotted along Yellowstone’s roads, grazing on clover, with Ignatz trotting behind.
She ignored the cars. The people inside the cars did not ignore her.
One tourist got so close that they nearly touched the green ear tags clipped to Sylvia’s ears. For the Craigheads, watching all of this unfold, that moment nearly sealed her fate. A woman reaching out to “pet” a wild grizzly is not an adorable scene. It’s almost a death sentence—for the bear.
“We will probably have to kill her as she is getting more dangerous each day,” John wrote afterward.
A One-Way Trip to the Bronx
A few hours later, Sylvia and Ignatz were captured again. For days, their future was uncertain as park officials scrambled for a solution that wouldn’t end with a rifle shot.
Eventually, the Bronx Zoo in New York agreed to take Sylvia.
“She is a beautiful bear and we hated to lose her,” John wrote, “but her temperament is such that she should adjust nicely to zoo life.”
Ignatz stayed behind.
He was already “beginning to make grizzly bear history,” as the first orphaned cub the Craigheads would follow closely. They watched him try—and fail—to be adopted by another bear family. They saw him wander the park alone, mostly staying away from the kinds of crowds that had clustered around his mother.
He survived his first winter on his own, proof that orphaned cubs could make it through the harsh Yellowstone cold. But his survival story was short-lived. By September 1962, Ignatz was found dead near Norris Geyser Basin. His brief, rough life later inspired a quiet tribute in the memoir of park ranger B. Riley McClelland.
What Sylvia’s Story Still Tells Us
Sylvia’s tale is bittersweet. She never attacked a tourist, but she came dangerously close to being killed because people treated her like a character in a wilderness theme park instead of a powerful, unpredictable animal.
Her story underlines a hard truth the Craigheads kept repeating: when wild animals lose their fear of humans, it’s almost always because we have taught them to.
Feeding bears, edging closer for a better photo, treating them as props instead of wild creatures—all of these choices push animals like Sylvia toward a line they can’t see but almost never come back from.
She ended her days far from Yellowstone, in a zoo on the other side of the continent. Ignatz never made it out of the park at all.
Their lives remind us that “tame” wildlife is often not a sign of harmony between humans and nature. It’s a warning that we have already crossed a boundary—and that the animals usually pay the price.



support our project
At History Affairs, we believe history belongs to everyone.
donateYour contribution helps us keep this global archive open, free, and growing — so people everywhere can learn from the past and shape a better future.
lastest
Ottoman Sultans and Their Vices: Alcohol, Drugs, Women, and Rebellious Princes
Ottoman Women 1500–1800: Home, Work, and Power
Joan of Arc’s Trial and Execution
A Short History of Ball Games: From Olmec Rubber to Japanese Kemari
Nevada History: From Ancient Rock Art to Neon Lights
The 1911 Champagne Riots in France
Julius Caesar and the Danger of Punishment Without Due Process
Sylvia the Grizzly the Celebrity Bear in Yellowstone
Theodore Roosevelt and the Modern White House Press Machine
reading more
A Review of Thomas Pakenham’s The Tree Hunters
The Crisis of the Third Century of Roman Empire
Persecution, Apologetics, and Martyrdom in Early Christianity
The Forgotten Woman Who Restored the British Monarchy
The Enigmatic Journey of Mary of Nazareth: A Tale of Faith, Mystery, and Reverence
William Wallace – The Saver of Scotland
Useful Enemies: Early Orientalism and French Power
The Seven Wonders of the Ancient World
Aelfgifu: Queen of England and Denmark
Heresies: Marcion, Gnosticism, Montanism, and Encratism Explained
The Whig Party: A Catalyst for American Political Evolution
Crassus and the Catastrophe at Carrhae